How to Choose the Right Model for Developing LLM-based Applications

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed how we build and interact with AI applications. Whether you want to develop a chatbot, automated content generator, code assistant, or domain-specific solution, selecting the right model is a critical first step. Given the rising number of models—both open-source (e.g., 8B parameters, 13B, 70B, 176B, etc.) and closed-source (e.g., proprietary API-based solutions)—it can be challenging to pick the right one. This article aims to help you assess your requirements and systematically evaluate different LLM options.

1. Determine Your Use Case and Requirements

Type of application

  • Conversational AI: A chatbot or virtual assistant might require a model with strong dialogue management and context-tracking capabilities.
  • Text generation: If you need to generate coherent text in multiple domains (e.g., marketing copy, creative writing), you need a model with broad knowledge and good generative quality.
  • Information retrieval or summarization: For summarizing articles or retrieving facts, look for a model known for factual accuracy and the ability to succinctly summarize content.
  • Domain-specific tasks: For specialized areas—such as legal, medical, or finance—models fine-tuned on domain-specific data can yield better performance and compliance (e.g., ensuring correct terminology).

Performance requirements

  • Accuracy vs. speed: A smaller model (e.g., 7B or 13B parameters) can be sufficient for quick tasks requiring lower latency, while bigger models (e.g., 70B or more) might provide better quality at the cost of slower inference.
  • Complexity vs. simplicity: If your application needs complex reasoning, a larger model might be more suitable. On the other hand, simpler tasks, like keyword extraction or basic text classification, can be handled by smaller or specialized models.

Deployment constraints

  • On-device or on-premises: If you aim to deploy in environments with strict data privacy regulations or limited network connectivity, you may need a smaller open-source model that can be deployed locally.
  • Cloud-based: If you have scalable cloud resources, you can leverage more powerful models. You might also use a closed-source API if it meets your compliance and cost requirements.

2. Understand Model Types (Open-Source vs. Closed-Source)

Open-Source Models

  • Flexibility: You can fine-tune or customize them to specific use cases. You control model updates, which can be critical for certain domains (e.g., legal, healthcare) or for brand voice adaptation.
  • Cost of ownership: Although the model is freely available, you will incur computational expenses (e.g., GPUs or cloud compute).
  • Transparency: Open-source models provide insights into training methods and architecture, which can help you debug and better understand model behavior.
  • Community support: Popular open-source models tend to have active communities that share improvements and best practices.

Closed-Source Models (Proprietary APIs)

  • Ease of integration: Managed platforms provide a straightforward API, reducing the need for infrastructure management and advanced ML expertise.
  • Fast time to market: Many closed-source providers also offer pre-trained specialized models (e.g., code generation, summarization, conversation). This speeds up prototyping.
  • Licensing constraints: You typically pay for usage, and there may be rate limits or usage quotas.
  • Limited control: Fine-tuning options may be restricted. You may not have visibility into how updates might affect your application.

3. Model Size Considerations (8B, 13B, 70B, 175B, 405B, etc.)

Smaller Models (2B to 13B)

  • Pros:
    • Faster inference
    • Lower resource requirements
    • Easier deployment (can be run on commodity hardware or smaller cloud instances)
  • Cons:
    • May struggle with complex reasoning tasks
    • May exhibit lower accuracy on broad general knowledge tasks
    • Tend to have less robust language generation capabilities

Ideal for:

  • Simple or well-defined tasks
  • Edge or on-prem deployments where compute resources are limited
  • Rapid iteration and experimentation

Mid-Sized Models (13B to 70B)

  • Pros:
    • Strikes a balance between performance and resource usage
    • Better language understanding and generation than smaller models
    • Can handle a wider variety of tasks
  • Cons:
    • Still requires significant GPU/TPU or cloud compute
    • Larger memory footprint

Ideal for:

  • Use cases that require moderate complexity
  • Businesses wanting a strong baseline without incurring massive infrastructure costs

Larger Models (70B to 100B+)

  • Pros:
    • State-of-the-art performance in many language tasks
    • Greater capacity for multi-step reasoning, nuanced understanding, and context tracking
  • Cons:
    • Substantial hardware requirements
    • Higher latency and cost
    • More challenging to fine-tune

Ideal for:

  • High-end applications with complex or open-ended tasks
  • Use cases that justify the cost via accuracy or quality improvements
  • Scenarios where you need the most advanced language capabilities available

Extra-Large or “Foundation” Models (100B+ up to 405B or more)

  • Pros:
    • Unparalleled capability on very diverse or complex tasks
    • Can be adapted to almost any downstream application with minimal fine-tuning
  • Cons:
    • Extremely expensive to run or fine-tune
    • Infrastructure complexity
    • Potential overkill for simpler applications

Ideal for:

  • Organizations with significant budgets and compute resources
  • Cutting-edge research and enterprise solutions requiring maximum language capabilities

4. Key Evaluation Metrics

When choosing among models, compare the following metrics:

  1. Performance: Review benchmarks on tasks that match your use case (e.g., GLUE, SQuAD, GPT-like benchmarks).
  2. Inference speed: Measure or estimate latency (how long it takes to get a response), especially for real-time applications.
  3. Memory footprint: Understand how much GPU/CPU RAM the model requires to run.
  4. Ease of fine-tuning: Check if the model supports LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation), P-Tuning, or other parameter-efficient methods to adapt it for your domain.
  5. Community and ecosystem: Evaluate how active the community is and the availability of third-party tooling, pretrained weights, and tutorials.
  6. Licensing and costs: For open-source models, confirm license compatibility with your product. For closed-source APIs, review usage pricing, throughput, or monthly cost estimates.

5. Practical Decision Framework

Start with a prototype:

  • Experiment with a smaller open-source model or a free-tier closed-source API to validate your idea.
  • This step helps you discover any domain nuances or unexpected constraints before scaling.

Assess scaling:

  • If performance is insufficient or the model’s responses lack depth, consider a mid-sized or larger model.
  • If latency or cost is too high, explore smaller or more optimized models.

Evaluate fine-tuning vs. prompting:

  • If you need domain-specific language, you’ll likely need to fine-tune (or at least conduct prompt engineering).
  • Check if the model provider allows fine-tuning and whether it’s cost-effective in your scenario.

Check compliance and data governance:

  • For healthcare, finance, or legal, compliance (e.g., HIPAA, GDPR) can dictate that your data remain on-premises or within your controlled environment.
  • Open-source models deployed on-site may be preferable in such scenarios.

Monitor iteration and updates:

  • LLMs can evolve rapidly. Keep an eye on new releases that offer better performance or efficiency.
  • Maintain a flexible deployment strategy to switch models or incorporate improvements over time.

6. Example Scenarios

Small eCommerce Chatbot

  • A 7B or 13B open-source model can be enough to handle product queries and FAQs. It can also run on a modest cloud instance or even some on-prem setups.

Enterprise Knowledge Base Search

  • A mid-sized model (e.g., 20B to 70B) with fine-tuning on internal documents can provide detailed responses and handle complex queries about product or corporate policies.

Advanced Research Assistant

  • A 70B+ or even a 100B+ model might be necessary for tasks requiring deep reasoning across multiple domains and large context windows.

Healthcare Diagnostics Assistant

  • A specialized open-source model fine-tuned on clinical data might be required to ensure privacy (running on hospital servers) and compliance with regulations.

      7. Conclusion

      Choosing the right large language model for your application is both an art and a science. Start by clarifying your application goals, performance needs, and resource constraints. Compare models based on open-source vs. closed-source, cost, model size, available tooling, and community support. Where possible, prototype and benchmark different options. This approach helps you zero in on a model that balances accuracy, speed, and cost—ultimately delivering a robust and efficient LLM-based application.

      By following this guide, you can navigate the ever-expanding LLM ecosystem confidently and select a model tailored to your specific needs. As the field evolves, stay informed about emerging techniques and new releases—ongoing innovation continues to reshape the art of “large” language modeling.

      Back to blog